Your thoughts... - Page 6

Fenulia · #51 07-30-2009, 05:52 PM

Hard to believe, but I totally agree with Argh on this one. Sometimes you have a guy fighting a devourer and a warlock, and then you rescue them from the warlock...

Argh · #52 07-31-2009, 02:02 AM

what's so hard to believe??
tactically, it makes sense...if i have to choose who to rescue, i don't see why i can't choose who i want to rescue from...back in the days, without a prevent, it wasn't such a big deal...now it makes a whole lotta difference

Syveril · #53 08-07-2009, 09:10 AM

+1 for Argh's suggestion. I was just thinking the same thing, but I finally got through to the tail end of this thread and saw that Argh had already suggested it.

Perhaps a reduced prevention for rescue when it fails due to battle lock? Maybe a 10 second prevention instead of the full prevent. Keeps the strategic aspect, but thematically a bit more accurate?

grimm · #54 08-19-2009, 06:13 AM

nod agree with the targettable rescue from who feature
________
CALIFORNIA DISPENSARY

Bihzad · #55 08-21-2009, 05:30 AM

Agreed, rescuing someone from a lumberjack when they're being hit by a butcher doesn't help much.

Odinn · #56 09-01-2009, 12:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sagord

What say you? Do you think this "New Deal" is going to work? Or are we destined for failure? I am thinking failure is much more likely. I would like to hear your thoughts.

What are you talking about, what "New Deal", please talk to us using English. Ohh and you need to convey what you are thinking- because we don't read minds.